Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Darden v. Blankenship, 02-1491 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-1491 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 31, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1491 In Re: MICHELE BLANKENSHIP, Debtor. CHARLES D. DARDEN, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHELE BLANKENSHIP, Defendant - Appellant, and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Party in Interest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-01-876-2, BK-99-25293-S) Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circu
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1491 In Re: MICHELE BLANKENSHIP, Debtor. CHARLES D. DARDEN, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHELE BLANKENSHIP, Defendant - Appellant, and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Party in Interest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-01-876-2, BK-99-25293-S) Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michele Blankenship, Appellant Pro Se. Charles D. Darden, Appellee Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Michele Blankenship appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order avoiding $3501 of Defendant’s $16,000 lien against her real property pursuant to 11 U.S.C.A. § 522(f) (West Supp. 2002). We have reviewed the record and the lower courts’ opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Darden v. Blankenship, Nos. CA-01-876-2; BK-99-25293-S (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 5, 2002; entered Apr. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer