Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Seidner v. PCA International, 01-2079 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-2079 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 29, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2079 JESSIE SEIDNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PCA INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, d/b/a American Studios, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-2054-AW) Submitted: June 18, 2002 Decided: July 29, 2002 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2079 JESSIE SEIDNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PCA INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, d/b/a American Studios, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-2054-AW) Submitted: June 18, 2002 Decided: July 29, 2002 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joe C. Ashworth, Leonardtown, Maryland, for Appellant. Charles E. Johnson, Angelique R. Vincent, ROBINSON, BRADSHAW & HINSON, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jessie Seidner appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to PCA International, Inc. on her claim of wrongful termination under Maryland law. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Seidner v. PCA Int’l, Inc., No. CA-00-2054-AW (D. Md. filed July 31, 2001 & entered Aug. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer