Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Jones, 02-6545 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-6545 Visitors: 28
Filed: Sep. 12, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6545 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TIMOTHY ANTONIO JONES, a/k/a Tony Smith, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-98-148, CA-01-18-3) Submitted: August 13, 2002 Decided: September 12, 2002 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by un
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6545 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TIMOTHY ANTONIO JONES, a/k/a Tony Smith, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-98-148, CA-01-18-3) Submitted: August 13, 2002 Decided: September 12, 2002 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Antonio Jones, Appellant Pro Se. S. David Schiller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Timothy Antonio Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-98-148; CA-01-18-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer