Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Frazier-El, 02-7025 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-7025 Visitors: 22
Filed: Sep. 11, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7025 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CLINTON BERNARD FRAZIER-EL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-469-WMN, CA-01-3412-HNM) Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 11, 2002 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7025 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CLINTON BERNARD FRAZIER-EL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-469-WMN, CA-01-3412-HNM) Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 11, 2002 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clinton Bernard Frazier-El, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields- Minnis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Clinton Bernard Frazier-El seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Frazier-El has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. United States v. Frazier-El, Nos. CR-96-469- WMN; CA-01-3412-HNM (D. Md. June 17, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer