Filed: Oct. 08, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7136 JOHN L. BOWMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. WICKS, Sergeant; MARY COILBERT, Nurse; JACK LEE, Warden; GENE SHINAULT, Assistant Warden; DOC WATSON, Inmate Hearings, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-813-7) Submitted: September 20, 2002 Decided: October 8, 2002 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7136 JOHN L. BOWMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. WICKS, Sergeant; MARY COILBERT, Nurse; JACK LEE, Warden; GENE SHINAULT, Assistant Warden; DOC WATSON, Inmate Hearings, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-813-7) Submitted: September 20, 2002 Decided: October 8, 2002 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7136 JOHN L. BOWMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. WICKS, Sergeant; MARY COILBERT, Nurse; JACK LEE, Warden; GENE SHINAULT, Assistant Warden; DOC WATSON, Inmate Hearings, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-813-7) Submitted: September 20, 2002 Decided: October 8, 2002 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John L. Bowman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: John L. Bowman, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Bowman v. Wicks, No. CA-02-813-7 (W.D. Va. July 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
