Filed: Oct. 16, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1490 PATRICIA W. FROMAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BUSCH ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-69-4) Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 16, 2002 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia W. Fromal,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1490 PATRICIA W. FROMAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BUSCH ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-69-4) Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 16, 2002 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia W. Fromal, A..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1490
PATRICIA W. FROMAL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BUSCH ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District
Judge. (CA-01-69-4)
Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 16, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patricia W. Fromal, Appellant Pro Se. William Franklin Devine, Lisa
Ann Bertini, Amberley Gibbs Jochens, HOFHEIMER & NUSBAUM, P.C.,
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Patricia Watkins Fromal appeals from the dismissal of her
personal injury claim following a jury verdict for Busch
Entertainment Corporation. Fromal claimed that she was injured
while disembarking from an amusement park ride at Busch Gardens.
Fromal does not suggest that the verdict of the jury was
contrary to the evidence or the controlling law. Rather, she
limits her appellate claims to numerous procedural issues alleging
violations of due process. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. See generally United States v. Weaver,
282 F.3d
302, 314 (2002) (holding that claims of procedural due process are
reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2