Filed: Nov. 22, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1508 PRISCILLA A. BANKS, formerly known as Priscilla A. Green, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FOOD LION, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge. (CA-01-841-2) Submitted: November 5, 2002 Decided: November 22, 2002 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1508 PRISCILLA A. BANKS, formerly known as Priscilla A. Green, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FOOD LION, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge. (CA-01-841-2) Submitted: November 5, 2002 Decided: November 22, 2002 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion...
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1508
PRISCILLA A. BANKS, formerly known as
Priscilla A. Green,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FOOD LION, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-01-841-2)
Submitted: November 5, 2002 Decided: November 22, 2002
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Simon H. Scott, III, SAMS & SCOTT, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellant. Robert W. McFarland, Bryan K. Meals, MCGUIRE WOODS,
L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia; William H. Baxter II, MCGUIRE WOODS,
L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Priscilla A. Banks appeals from the magistrate judge’s order*
granting summary judgment for Food Lion in Banks’ personal injury
action. We have reviewed the briefs, the joint appendix, and the
magistrate judge’s order and find that the magistrate judge
properly granted summary judgment in favor of Food Lion. See Grim
v. Rahe,
434 S.E.2d 888 (Va. 1993); Colonial Stores, Inc. v.
Pulley,
125 S.E.2d 188 (Va. 1962). Accordingly, we affirm. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (2000), the parties consented
to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge.
2