Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bush v. Commissioner, IRS, 02-1949 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-1949 Visitors: 28
Filed: Nov. 27, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1949 CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH BUSH; ROBIN LEIGH PICKERING, Petitioners - Appellants, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 00-7401) Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: November 27, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Joseph Bush, Robin Leigh Pickering, Appellants Pro Se
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1949 CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH BUSH; ROBIN LEIGH PICKERING, Petitioners - Appellants, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 00-7401) Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: November 27, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Joseph Bush, Robin Leigh Pickering, Appellants Pro Se. Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, Teresa Ellen McLaughlin, Laurie Allyn Snyder, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; B. John Williams, Jr., INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Christopher Joseph Bush and Robin Leigh Pickering appeal from the tax court’s order determining a deficiency with respect to their 1996 federal income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and the tax court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. See Bush v. Commissioner, No. 00-7401 (U.S. Tax Ct. May 14, 2002). We deny Appellants’ motion for formal briefs and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer