Filed: Dec. 12, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-4552 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOE ERNAL LEWIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-01-64-H) Submitted: November 13, 2002 Decided: December 12, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas P. McNamara, Fed
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-4552 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOE ERNAL LEWIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-01-64-H) Submitted: November 13, 2002 Decided: December 12, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas P. McNamara, Fede..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-4552
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOE ERNAL LEWIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CR-01-64-H)
Submitted: November 13, 2002 Decided: December 12, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois,
Assistant Federal Public Defender, Jane E. Pearce, FEDERAL PUBLIC
DEFENDER’S OFFICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank
D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United
States Attorney, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States
Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Joe E. Lewis appeals the district court’s order sentencing him
to ninety-six months imprisonment and five years of supervised
release pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act, found at 18
U.S.C. § 924(e) (2000), for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find this appeal foreclosed
by our decision in United States v. Sterling,
283 F.3d 216 (4th
Cir. 2002). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
affirmed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2