Filed: Jan. 03, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1323 In Re: GOFF BUILDING, LLC, Debtor. GOFF BUILDING, LLC, Debtor - Appellant, versus NORWEST BANK, MINNESOTA, NA, Creditor - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-19-1, BK-01-10034) Argued: December 6, 2002 Decided: January 3, 2003 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and Henry M. HERLONG, J
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1323 In Re: GOFF BUILDING, LLC, Debtor. GOFF BUILDING, LLC, Debtor - Appellant, versus NORWEST BANK, MINNESOTA, NA, Creditor - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-19-1, BK-01-10034) Argued: December 6, 2002 Decided: January 3, 2003 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and Henry M. HERLONG, Jr..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1323 In Re: GOFF BUILDING, LLC, Debtor. GOFF BUILDING, LLC, Debtor - Appellant, versus NORWEST BANK, MINNESOTA, NA, Creditor - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-19-1, BK-01-10034) Argued: December 6, 2002 Decided: January 3, 2003 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and Henry M. HERLONG, Jr., United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. ARGUED: Brent E. Beveridge, BEVERIDGE LAW OFFICES, Fairmont, West Virginia, for Appellant. Julia A. Chincheck, BOWLES, RICE, MCDAVID, GRAFF & LOVE, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: During oral arguments held on December 6, 2002, the parties agreed that the issues raised in this appeal are moot. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. DISMISSED 2
