Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Green v. Mee, 02-2180 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-2180 Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 30, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2180 KEITH ANDREW GREEN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KAREN MEE; C. EDMONDS; C. R. MORRISON, Esquire; DONNA WATTS-LAMONT, Associate Member; HAZEL A. WARNICK, Chairperson; MICHAEL TAYLOR, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-02- 2719-MJG) Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 30, 2002 Before WILKIN
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2180 KEITH ANDREW GREEN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KAREN MEE; C. EDMONDS; C. R. MORRISON, Esquire; DONNA WATTS-LAMONT, Associate Member; HAZEL A. WARNICK, Chairperson; MICHAEL TAYLOR, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-02- 2719-MJG) Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 30, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Andrew Green, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Keith Andrew Green appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil action against officials from the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation and the attorney for his former employer, Colonial Parking. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Mee, No. CA-02-2719-MJG (D. Md. filed Sept. 30, 2002; entered Oct. 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer