Filed: Mar. 17, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6073 FERMAN ALVIN RUPPE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus K. L. OSBORNE, Warden; F. M. CULAN, Assistant Warden; LIEUTENANT JOHNSON, Chief of Security; COLIN ANGLICKER, Doctor; K. CULLOP, Corrections Officer; T. PARKS, Nurse, LPN, Marion CC; DOCTOR RENARD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-75-7) Subm
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6073 FERMAN ALVIN RUPPE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus K. L. OSBORNE, Warden; F. M. CULAN, Assistant Warden; LIEUTENANT JOHNSON, Chief of Security; COLIN ANGLICKER, Doctor; K. CULLOP, Corrections Officer; T. PARKS, Nurse, LPN, Marion CC; DOCTOR RENARD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-75-7) Submi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6073
FERMAN ALVIN RUPPE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
K. L. OSBORNE, Warden; F. M. CULAN, Assistant
Warden; LIEUTENANT JOHNSON, Chief of Security;
COLIN ANGLICKER, Doctor; K. CULLOP,
Corrections Officer; T. PARKS, Nurse, LPN,
Marion CC; DOCTOR RENARD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-75-7)
Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 17, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ferman Alvin Ruppe, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Jim Harold
Guynn, Jr., Melvin Edward Williams, GUYNN & MEMMER, P.C., Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Ferman Alvin Ruppe appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Ruppe v. Osborne, No.
CA-02-75-7 (W.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2