Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re: Sheppard v., 02-7421 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-7421 Visitors: 32
Filed: Apr. 01, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7421 In Re: JERRY WAYNE SHEPPARD, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-94-122, CA-98-747) Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: April 1, 2003 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Wayne Sheppard, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jerry Wayne Sheppard petitions
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7421 In Re: JERRY WAYNE SHEPPARD, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-94-122, CA-98-747) Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: April 1, 2003 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Wayne Sheppard, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jerry Wayne Sheppard petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. After Sheppard filed the instant mandamus petition, the district court ruled on his § 2255 motion. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition but grant Sheppard’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer