Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Boyd v. Bell, 03-6094 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-6094 Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 31, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6094 BRIAN ANTHONY BOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER BELL; EDDIE PEARSON, Warden; RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; DAVID EVERETTE, Security Warden; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; OFFICER BANKS; OFFICER KENNON; HOUSTON L. SHIFFLETT; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald B
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6094 BRIAN ANTHONY BOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER BELL; EDDIE PEARSON, Warden; RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; DAVID EVERETTE, Security Warden; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; OFFICER BANKS; OFFICER KENNON; HOUSTON L. SHIFFLETT; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-01-1745-AM) Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 31, 2003 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brian Anthony Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Brian Anthony Boyd appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Boyd v. Bell, No. CA-01-1745-AM (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 2, 2002 & entered Dec. 5, 2002). We deny Boyd’s motion for a transcript at government expense as the district court did not conduct a hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer