Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bartlett v. Moore, 03-6118 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-6118 Visitors: 33
Filed: Mar. 31, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6118 ROBERT ANDREW BARTLETT, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARIO MOORE, Prisoner; RICHARD FRYE, Sheriff; TODD DAVIS, Captain; MARK DODSON, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-482-1) Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 31, 2003 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6118 ROBERT ANDREW BARTLETT, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARIO MOORE, Prisoner; RICHARD FRYE, Sheriff; TODD DAVIS, Captain; MARK DODSON, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-482-1) Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 31, 2003 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Andrew Bartlett, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. David Iverson Smith, ALAMANCE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Graham, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Robert Andrew Bartlett, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bartlett v. Moore, No. CA-00-482-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer