Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Williams v. Warner, 03-1372 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-1372 Visitors: 60
Filed: May 20, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1372 BURT SHERMAN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARK R. WARNER, Governor, Commonwealth of Virginia; WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION; JERRY W. KILGORE, Attorney General; C. RAY DAVENPORT, Commissioner Labor and Industry, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-149-4) Submitted: May 15,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1372 BURT SHERMAN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARK R. WARNER, Governor, Commonwealth of Virginia; WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION; JERRY W. KILGORE, Attorney General; C. RAY DAVENPORT, Commissioner Labor and Industry, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-149-4) Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 20, 2003 Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Burt Sherman Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Elaine Scott Moore, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Burt Sherman Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Warner, No. CA-02-149-4 (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer