Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Allmond v. Alexandria Sheriff's, 03-1172 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-1172 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 03, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1172 DARRYL ALLMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALEXANDRIA SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; EDWARD J. PROKOP, Chief Deputy; JOHN KAPETANIS, Sergeant; GEORGE GRAY, Deputy; DARREN HINZMAN, Deputy, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-02-309-A) Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 3, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1172 DARRYL ALLMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALEXANDRIA SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; EDWARD J. PROKOP, Chief Deputy; JOHN KAPETANIS, Sergeant; GEORGE GRAY, Deputy; DARREN HINZMAN, Deputy, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-02-309-A) Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 3, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darryl Allmond, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Kearney Saba, SHUFORD, RUBIN & GIBNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Darryl Allmond appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Allmond v. Alexandria Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-02-309-A (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 22, 2003 & entered Jan. 23, 2003; Jan. 29, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer