Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wade v. Angelone, 03-6733 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-6733 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 02, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6733 EARL VONNEY WADE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE, Director of DOC; DR. VERNON SMITH, Health Services Director;* MR. BRAXTON, Chief Warden; MS. RAY, Medical Administrator, Sussex I State Prison; MS. SECRIST, Health Nurse, Sussex I State Prison; RUFUS FLEMING, Regional Director; CMS, which stands for Correctional Medical Service; MS. CLOW, Nurse, Sussex I State Prison; PRISON HEALTH SERVICES; MS. BRIT; MS. TY
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6733 EARL VONNEY WADE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE, Director of DOC; DR. VERNON SMITH, Health Services Director;* MR. BRAXTON, Chief Warden; MS. RAY, Medical Administrator, Sussex I State Prison; MS. SECRIST, Health Nurse, Sussex I State Prison; RUFUS FLEMING, Regional Director; CMS, which stands for Correctional Medical Service; MS. CLOW, Nurse, Sussex I State Prison; PRISON HEALTH SERVICES; MS. BRIT; MS. TYLER; BASKERVILLE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-174-2) Submitted: June 13, 2003 Decided: July 2, 2003 Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. * Dr. Smith died during the pendency of this appeal. 2 Earl Vonney Wade, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Edward Joseph McNelis, III, Coreen Antoinette Bromfield, John David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Lynne Jones Blain, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Earl Vonney Wade appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wade v. Angelone, No. CA-01-174-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 2002; filed Sept. 27, 2002 & entered Sept. 30, 2002; Apr. 8, 2003). We deny Wade’s motions for injunctive relief and appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer