Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Yeung v. Loudoun County Pub, 03-1199 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-1199 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 10, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1199 AHMIELLEAH A.D.P. YEUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LOUDOUN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; WAYNE GRIFFITH, Principal, Potomac Falls High School, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-775-A) Submitted: August 27, 2003 Decided: September 10, 2003 Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILT
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1199 AHMIELLEAH A.D.P. YEUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LOUDOUN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; WAYNE GRIFFITH, Principal, Potomac Falls High School, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-775-A) Submitted: August 27, 2003 Decided: September 10, 2003 Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael A. Wasylik, THE LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL ALEX WASYLIK, McLean, Virginia, for Appellant. John D. McGavin, Michael J. Carita, TRICHILO, BANCROFT, MCGAVIN, HORVATH & JUDKINS, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Ahmielleah A.D.P. Yeung appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action alleging a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yeung v. Loudoun County Pub. Sch., No. CA- 02-775-A (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 17, 2003 & entered Jan. 21, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer