Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Price v. McCormack, 03-1385 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-1385 Visitors: 21
Filed: Sep. 10, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1385 WILLIE JAMES PRICE, Plaintiff - Appellant, and VALERIE YOUNG, Plaintiff, versus RONALD C. MCCORMACK, Attorney; EDWARD F. HOLLORAN, Attorney; RUSSELL D. KNIGHT; GEORGE MILLESON, Defendants - Appellees, STAFFORD COUNTY, Movant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-01-1212-A) Submitted: July 7, 2003 Decided: September 10, 20
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1385 WILLIE JAMES PRICE, Plaintiff - Appellant, and VALERIE YOUNG, Plaintiff, versus RONALD C. MCCORMACK, Attorney; EDWARD F. HOLLORAN, Attorney; RUSSELL D. KNIGHT; GEORGE MILLESON, Defendants - Appellees, STAFFORD COUNTY, Movant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-01-1212-A) Submitted: July 7, 2003 Decided: September 10, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie James Price, Appellant Pro Se. John Andrew Basham, HEILIG, MCKENRY, FRAIM & LOLLAR, Norfolk, Virginia; Gerald Thomas Schafer, INJURY LAW CENTER, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Russell D. Knight, Stafford, Virginia; George Milleson, Stafford, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Willie James Price appeals the district court’s order denying a motion to reinstate a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action that the district court dismissed in 2001 for failure to state a claim.* The district court construed the motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and denied it. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Price v. McCormack, No. CA- 01-1212-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2003). We also affirm the magistrate judge’s order awarding sanctions to the Defendants. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Although Valerie Young was an original party to this case in the district court, only Willie James Price has pursued this appeal. 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer