Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Stewart v. Raborg, 03-6276 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-6276 Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 17, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6276 LARRY L. STEWART, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W.B. RABORG, State Police/Trooper, Defendant - Appellee. No. 03-6567 LARRY L. STEWART, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W.B. RABORG, State Police/Trooper, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-03-41-AM) Submitted: September 11, 2003 Decided: September 17, 2
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6276 LARRY L. STEWART, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W.B. RABORG, State Police/Trooper, Defendant - Appellee. No. 03-6567 LARRY L. STEWART, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W.B. RABORG, State Police/Trooper, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-03-41-AM) Submitted: September 11, 2003 Decided: September 17, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry L. Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Larry L. Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stewart v. Raborg, No. CA-03-41-AM (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 21, 2003 & entered Jan. 27, 2003; filed Mar. 10, 2003 & entered Mar. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer