Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Leggette v. Moore, 03-1685 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-1685 Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 22, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1685 ROBBIN LEGGETTE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CRYSTAL MOORE, Corporal; JOY CUTLER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-02-1635-4) Submitted: October 1, 2003 Decided: October 22, 2003 Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per cur
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1685 ROBBIN LEGGETTE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CRYSTAL MOORE, Corporal; JOY CUTLER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-02-1635-4) Submitted: October 1, 2003 Decided: October 22, 2003 Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robbin Leggette, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Charles Baxter, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, CARPENTER & ROBINSON, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina; William Henry Davidson, II, David Leon Morrison, Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Robbin Leggette appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Leggette v. Moore, No. CA-02-1635-4 (D.S.C. filed May 6, 2003 & entered May 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer