Filed: Oct. 22, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1522 HERBERT HAYES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEMMA POWER SYSTEM, LLC; EDDIE HACELTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-312-5-F) Submitted: September 8, 2003 Decided: October 22, 2003 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herb
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1522 HERBERT HAYES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEMMA POWER SYSTEM, LLC; EDDIE HACELTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-312-5-F) Submitted: September 8, 2003 Decided: October 22, 2003 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herbe..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1522 HERBERT HAYES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEMMA POWER SYSTEM, LLC; EDDIE HACELTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-312-5-F) Submitted: September 8, 2003 Decided: October 22, 2003 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herbert Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Allen Holt Gwyn, Jr., CONNER, GWYN & SCHENCK, P.L.L.C., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Herbert Hayes appeals the district court’s orders granting Respondents’ motion for summary judgment in his employment discrimination action and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hayes v. Gemma Power Sys., L.L.C., No. CA-01-312-5-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 19, 2003 & Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2