Filed: Oct. 30, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-4255 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ORLANDO VILLANUEVA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-01-622-AW) Submitted: October 8, 2003 Decided: October 30, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harry D. McKnett, Columbia,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-4255 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ORLANDO VILLANUEVA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-01-622-AW) Submitted: October 8, 2003 Decided: October 30, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harry D. McKnett, Columbia, M..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-4255
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ORLANDO VILLANUEVA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CR-01-622-AW)
Submitted: October 8, 2003 Decided: October 30, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harry D. McKnett, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas M.
DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Odessa P. Jackson, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Orlando Villanueva appeals from his conviction and sentence
imposed for health care fraud and conspiracy to commit health care
fraud. He contends that the district court erred in admitting into
evidence the government’s charts as summary exhibits. We have
reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs and find no abuse of
discretion by the district court in admitting the challenged
charts. See United States v. Strissel,
920 F.2d 1162, 1163-64
(4th Cir. 1990) (providing standard). Accordingly, we affirm
Villanueva’s conviction. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2