Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Baxter v. Charleston Orphan House, 03-2164 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-2164 Visitors: 43
Filed: Jan. 27, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2164 DELORES L. BAXTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLESTON ORPHAN HOUSE, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Carolina Youth Development Center, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-02-11-2-18) Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 27, 2004 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2164 DELORES L. BAXTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLESTON ORPHAN HOUSE, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Carolina Youth Development Center, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-02-11-2-18) Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 27, 2004 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Delores L. Baxter, Appellant Pro Se. James Walter Coleman, IV, Mary Legare Hughes, NEXSEN, PRUET, JACOBS, POLLARD & ROBINSON, L.L.C., Charleston, South Carolina. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Delores L. Baxter appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment for Charleston Orphan House, Inc. on her wrongful discharge and hostile work environment claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Baxter v. Charleston Orphan House, Inc., No. CA-02-11-2-18 (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer