Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Berry v. Shy, 03-7596 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-7596 Visitors: 25
Filed: Feb. 06, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7596 JAMES WILLIAM BERRY, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TOBY F. SHY, Sheriff; JAMES H. BOOTEN, Commissioner; RICK WELLMAN, Commissioner; CHARLES SAMMONS, Commissioner; TIM JARRELL, Correctional Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-604-3) Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided:
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7596 JAMES WILLIAM BERRY, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TOBY F. SHY, Sheriff; JAMES H. BOOTEN, Commissioner; RICK WELLMAN, Commissioner; CHARLES SAMMONS, Commissioner; TIM JARRELL, Correctional Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-604-3) Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 6, 2004 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James William Berry, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Tanya Annette Hunt, MACCORKLE, LAVENDER, CASEY & SWEENEY, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James William Berry, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order denying relief in his action in which he asserted claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), and the Americans with Disabilities Act.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Berry v. Shy, No. CA-00-604-3 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * In light of the disposition of the federal claims, the district court dismissed Berry’s claim under the West Virginia Freedom of Information Act, without prejudice to his rights to file such claim in state court. - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer