Filed: Feb. 26, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7710 STERLING BOONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RANDY LEE, Superintendent; WILLIAM MAYO, Sargeant; JEFF BATTLE; LENWOOD KNIGHT; RICKY ANDERSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (CA-03-722-5-FL) Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 26, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit J
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7710 STERLING BOONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RANDY LEE, Superintendent; WILLIAM MAYO, Sargeant; JEFF BATTLE; LENWOOD KNIGHT; RICKY ANDERSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (CA-03-722-5-FL) Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 26, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Ju..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7710 STERLING BOONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RANDY LEE, Superintendent; WILLIAM MAYO, Sargeant; JEFF BATTLE; LENWOOD KNIGHT; RICKY ANDERSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (CA-03-722-5-FL) Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 26, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sterling Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Sterling Boone appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Boone’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Boone v. Lee, No. CA-03-722- 5-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED - 2 -
