Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dowdy v. Dowdy, 03-1897 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-1897 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 24, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1897 IN RE: REBECCA ROBINSON DOWDY, Debtor. - REBECCA ROBINSON DOWDY, Debtor - Appellant, versus OTIS DOWDY, Debtor - Appellee, and REBECCA CONNELLY, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1222-7; BK-00-941-7) Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judg
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1897 IN RE: REBECCA ROBINSON DOWDY, Debtor. ------------------------------- REBECCA ROBINSON DOWDY, Debtor - Appellant, versus OTIS DOWDY, Debtor - Appellee, and REBECCA CONNELLY, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1222-7; BK-00-941-7) Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary M. Bowman, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Malissa L. Giles, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Rebecca Robinson Dowdy appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court and (2) denying her motions for reconsideration and for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dowdy v. Dowdy, Nos. CA-02-1222-7; BK-00-941-7 (W.D. Va. June 20, 2003; July 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer