Filed: Mar. 17, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2486 In Re: JEROME P. REIMANN, Debtor, - TERRI L. GARDNER, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JEROME P. REIMANN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (CA-03-794-FL-5; BK-01-1319-5-ATS) Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 17, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpubli
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2486 In Re: JEROME P. REIMANN, Debtor, - TERRI L. GARDNER, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JEROME P. REIMANN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (CA-03-794-FL-5; BK-01-1319-5-ATS) Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 17, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublis..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2486 In Re: JEROME P. REIMANN, Debtor, -------------------------------------------------------- TERRI L. GARDNER, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JEROME P. REIMANN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (CA-03-794-FL-5; BK-01-1319-5-ATS) Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 17, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome P. Reimann, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jerome P. Reimann appeals the district court’s order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court as untimely filed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gardner v. Reimann, Nos. CA-03-794-FL-5; BK-01-1319-5- ATS (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 18, 2003 & entered Nov. 19, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
