Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Craig v. IRS, 04-1079 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-1079 Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 01, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1079 EDWARD P. CRAIG, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; MARK W. EVERSON, Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-908-A) Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 1, 2004 Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edwa
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1079 EDWARD P. CRAIG, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; MARK W. EVERSON, Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-908-A) Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 1, 2004 Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward P. Craig, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L. Greene, Karen Deborah Utiger, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Edward P. Craig, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint in which he sought a refund of income taxes. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Craig v. Internal Rev. Serv., No. CA-03-908-A (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 23, 2003; entered Dec. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer