Filed: Apr. 15, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2359 TERENCE G. WESTRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-1129-1) Submitted: March 22, 2004 Decided: April 15, 2004 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terence G. We
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2359 TERENCE G. WESTRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-1129-1) Submitted: March 22, 2004 Decided: April 15, 2004 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terence G. Wes..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2359 TERENCE G. WESTRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-1129-1) Submitted: March 22, 2004 Decided: April 15, 2004 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terence G. Westry, Appellant Pro Se. Celia Grasty Lata, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Terence G. Westry appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to North Carolina A&T State University in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Westry v. North Carolina A&T State University, No. CA-01-1129-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
