Filed: May 05, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6235 VERNON S. BULLOCK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COUNTY OF WAKE; DONNIE HARRISON; FRANK GUNTER; WANDA STRICKLAND; JOHN A. MAXFIELD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (CA-03-830-5-FL) Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 5, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by u
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6235 VERNON S. BULLOCK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COUNTY OF WAKE; DONNIE HARRISON; FRANK GUNTER; WANDA STRICKLAND; JOHN A. MAXFIELD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (CA-03-830-5-FL) Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 5, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by un..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6235 VERNON S. BULLOCK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COUNTY OF WAKE; DONNIE HARRISON; FRANK GUNTER; WANDA STRICKLAND; JOHN A. MAXFIELD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (CA-03-830-5-FL) Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 5, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vernon S. Bullock, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Vernon S. Bullock appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bullock v. County of Wake, No. CA-03- 830-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
