Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Woody v. Central Carolina Bank, 03-2440 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-2440 Visitors: 35
Filed: May 03, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2440 TRACY WOODY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CENTRAL CAROLINA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, a/k/a Central Carolina Bank, a/k/a CCB, a/k/a CCB7; NATIONAL COMMERCE FINANCIAL CORPORATION/NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE/NCBC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-757-5-BO) Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decid
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2440 TRACY WOODY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CENTRAL CAROLINA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, a/k/a Central Carolina Bank, a/k/a CCB, a/k/a CCB7; NATIONAL COMMERCE FINANCIAL CORPORATION/NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE/NCBC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-757-5-BO) Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 3, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tracy Woody, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Dean Fisher, STUBBS, COLE, BREEDLOVE, PRENTIS & BIGGS, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Tracy Woody appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action as barred by res judicata. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Woody v. Cent. Carolina Bank & Trust Co., No. CA-02-757-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer