Filed: May 03, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7506 WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE STATE OF MARYLAND; HARFORD COUNTY GOVERNMENT; HARFORD COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; JOHN WALKER, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-03-1388-DKC) Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 3, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7506 WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE STATE OF MARYLAND; HARFORD COUNTY GOVERNMENT; HARFORD COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; JOHN WALKER, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-03-1388-DKC) Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 3, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges...
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7506
WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE STATE OF MARYLAND; HARFORD COUNTY
GOVERNMENT; HARFORD COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT; JOHN WALKER, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
(CA-03-1388-DKC)
Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 3, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
William Allen Legg seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying various post-judgment motions. We dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction, because the notice of appeal was not
timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the
district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.
App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal
period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period
under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory
and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,
434 U.S.
257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson,
361 U.S. 220,
229 (1960)).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on
July 22, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed on September 16,
2003. Because Legg failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to
obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss
the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -