Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Seymour v. Lusby, 04-6237 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-6237 Visitors: 43
Filed: May 19, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6237 EDWARD THOMAS SEYMOUR, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT LUSBY; LARRY WELCH, Administration; CAPTAIN PARRIN, Calvert County Detention Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-1137-1-MJG) Submitted: May 13, 2004 Decided: May 19, 2004 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. A
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6237 EDWARD THOMAS SEYMOUR, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT LUSBY; LARRY WELCH, Administration; CAPTAIN PARRIN, Calvert County Detention Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-1137-1-MJG) Submitted: May 13, 2004 Decided: May 19, 2004 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Thomas Seymour, III, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Breads, Jr., LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSURANCE TRUST, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Edward Thomas Seymour, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Seymour v. Lusby, No. CA-03-1137-1-MJG (D. Md. Jan. 14, 2004). We deny Seymour’s motions to file a formal brief, for oral argument, and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer