Filed: Jun. 01, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1119 GARRI SHTEIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BANK OF AMERICA, FSB, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-1159-CBD) Submitted: May 7, 2004 Decided: June 1, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Garri Shtein, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Patrick Mc
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1119 GARRI SHTEIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BANK OF AMERICA, FSB, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-1159-CBD) Submitted: May 7, 2004 Decided: June 1, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Garri Shtein, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Patrick McG..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1119 GARRI SHTEIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BANK OF AMERICA, FSB, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-1159-CBD) Submitted: May 7, 2004 Decided: June 1, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Garri Shtein, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Patrick McGlone, Todd Russell Chason, GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER & HOLLANDER, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Garri Shtein appeals the magistrate judge’s letter order dismissing his discrimination and conspiracy to invade privacy action with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.* Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Shtein v. Bank of America, No. CA-03-1159-CBD (D. Md. Nov. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 -