Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Willis v. Town of Trenton NC, 04-1104 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-1104 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jul. 13, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1104 DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS, Chairman, Jones County Improvement Association, Plaintiff - Appellant, and JONES COUNTY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, versus TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA; SYLVIA A. WILLIS, Mayor; WILLARD O. LEWIS, Council Member; AL RIGGS, Council Member; CHARLES JONES, Council Member; C. GLENN SPIVEY, Town Clerk; TRENTON MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION, C. Glenn Spivey as President; CAROL M. HOOD; INEZ KOONCE BAN
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1104 DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS, Chairman, Jones County Improvement Association, Plaintiff - Appellant, and JONES COUNTY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, versus TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA; SYLVIA A. WILLIS, Mayor; WILLARD O. LEWIS, Council Member; AL RIGGS, Council Member; CHARLES JONES, Council Member; C. GLENN SPIVEY, Town Clerk; TRENTON MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION, C. Glenn Spivey as President; CAROL M. HOOD; INEZ KOONCE BANKS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-7-MC-H) Submitted: June 18, 2004 Decided: July 13, 2004 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider its denial of his request to file a complaint. Willis is subject to a pre-filing review order with regard to actions against the Town of Trenton, which was named as a defendant in the present complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Willis v. Town of Trenton, No. CA-03-7-MC-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 7, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer