Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Corbin v. Bladen County, 04-1310 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-1310 Visitors: 25
Filed: Aug. 03, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1310 DAVID R. CORBIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BLADEN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY; H. GOLDSTON WOMBLE, JR.; DONALD SHERRILL; ALAN I. MAYNARD; ALLEN W. ROGERS; AJIT NAIK, MD; MYRA HOLLOWAY; DONNA PARNELL; BILL SCARLETT; TOMMY GRIFFIN; EARL BUTLER; VANN PARKER; ELIZABETH KIEVER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1310 DAVID R. CORBIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BLADEN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY; H. GOLDSTON WOMBLE, JR.; DONALD SHERRILL; ALAN I. MAYNARD; ALLEN W. ROGERS; AJIT NAIK, MD; MYRA HOLLOWAY; DONNA PARNELL; BILL SCARLETT; TOMMY GRIFFIN; EARL BUTLER; VANN PARKER; ELIZABETH KIEVER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-181-H-3) Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 3, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David R. Corbin, Appellant Pro Se. H. Goldston Womble, Jr., Elizabethtown, North Carolina; James Murrel Cooper, COOPER, DAVIS & COOPER, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Alan I. Maynard, Elizabethtown, North Carolina; Allen W. Rogers, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Mark E. Anderson, PATTERSON, DILTHEY, CLAY, BRYSON & ANDERSON, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ryan Michael Shuirman, YATES, MCLAMB & WEYHER, Raleigh, North Carolina; Douglas Edward Canders, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Grady L. Balentine, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: David R. Corbin appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Corbin v. Bladen County, CA-03-181-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2003 & Jan. 6, 2004). We deny Ajit Naik’s motion for certificate of service default and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer