Filed: Aug. 11, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7746 LEARIE A. DALY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CARROLL COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF’S OFFICE; GEORGE HARDINGER, Lieutenant Colonel; EARL STEVEN TURVIN, Major, Defendants - Appellees, and CARROLL COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; JOE HERNANDEZ, Deputy First Class, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03- 1660-AMD) Submitted
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7746 LEARIE A. DALY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CARROLL COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF’S OFFICE; GEORGE HARDINGER, Lieutenant Colonel; EARL STEVEN TURVIN, Major, Defendants - Appellees, and CARROLL COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; JOE HERNANDEZ, Deputy First Class, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03- 1660-AMD) Submitted:..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7746 LEARIE A. DALY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CARROLL COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF’S OFFICE; GEORGE HARDINGER, Lieutenant Colonel; EARL STEVEN TURVIN, Major, Defendants - Appellees, and CARROLL COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; JOE HERNANDEZ, Deputy First Class, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03- 1660-AMD) Submitted: May 24, 2004 Decided: August 11, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Learie A. Daly, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Breads, Jr., LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSURANCE TRUST, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Learie A. Daly appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Daly v. Carroll County Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-03-1660-AMD (D. Md. Oct. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -