Filed: Aug. 10, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6173 WAYNE GENOVA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MAJOR TALLEY, Jail Administrator; DR. FOX, Jail Psychologist; MRS. KING, Mental Health Worker, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-858) Submitted: July 16, 2004 Decided: August 10, 2004 Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by u
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6173 WAYNE GENOVA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MAJOR TALLEY, Jail Administrator; DR. FOX, Jail Psychologist; MRS. KING, Mental Health Worker, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-858) Submitted: July 16, 2004 Decided: August 10, 2004 Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by un..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6173
WAYNE GENOVA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MAJOR TALLEY, Jail Administrator; DR. FOX,
Jail Psychologist; MRS. KING, Mental Health
Worker,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-03-858)
Submitted: July 16, 2004 Decided: August 10, 2004
Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Genova, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Wayne Genova appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 2000) action for failure to
comply with the court’s order that he particularize his complaint.
Because the district court’s dismissal was without prejudice, it is
not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp v. Sugar Workers Local Union
392,
10 F.3d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we deny the
motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss the
appeal. If he chooses, Genova may refile his complaint in district
court, being careful to be sufficiently particular in the details
of his claim to satisfy the district court’s prior order.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -