Filed: Aug. 09, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6399 TAMMY M. STONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL JAIL; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BUCKNER, Booking/Holding, Defendants - Appellees. No. 04-6400 TAMMY M. STONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MS. PERRY, Counselor of South Central Regional Jail, Defendant - Appellee. No. 04-6401 TAMMY M. STONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KANAWHA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; J. L. WALKER, Defendants - Appellees. No. 04-64
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6399 TAMMY M. STONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL JAIL; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BUCKNER, Booking/Holding, Defendants - Appellees. No. 04-6400 TAMMY M. STONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MS. PERRY, Counselor of South Central Regional Jail, Defendant - Appellee. No. 04-6401 TAMMY M. STONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KANAWHA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; J. L. WALKER, Defendants - Appellees. No. 04-640..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6399
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL JAIL; CORRECTIONAL
OFFICER BUCKNER, Booking/Holding,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 04-6400
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MS. PERRY, Counselor of South Central Regional
Jail,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 04-6401
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KANAWHA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; J. L.
WALKER,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 04-6402
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 04-6403
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICK HALLORICK, Magistrate,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 04-6404
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
- 2 -
versus
JEFF STEWART, Public Defender,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 04-6405
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KRT SUPERVISOR WARNER,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 04-6406
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPUTY BRALEY, Kanawha County Sheriff’s
Department and Quincy Detachment,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 04-6407
- 3 -
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMMANDER HILL, West Virginia State Police;
TROOPER ZERKLE; SERGEANT FRYE; SERGEANT
BOWMAN; MARK JOHNS,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 04-6408
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CHARLESTON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Patrol Division; OFFICER EARY,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 04-6409
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SERGEANT JARRELL; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, South
Central Regional Jail,
Defendants - Appellees.
- 4 -
No. 04-6410
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DARRELL S. TOWNSEND; LAURIE A. TOWNSEND,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 04-6411
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DONNA KAY MURPHY; POCA POST OFFICE; LAURIE
TOWNSEND; DARRELL TOWNSEND,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 04-6412
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL CLIFFORD, Prosecutor,
- 5 -
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 04-6413
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LARRY GLASSBURG, SR.,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 04-6414
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DANNY JONES, Mayor or former Kanawha County
Sheriff,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 04-6415
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
- 6 -
WILLIAM LESTER,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 04-6416
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOUGLAS WENDEL ARTRIP; LISA FARRELL; DENNIS
ARTRIP; MARY ANN ARTRIP,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 04-6417
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ADMINISTRATOR MURRAY, Kanawha County and State
Court,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 04-6418
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
- 7 -
versus
MEREDITH PERRY, Counselor; UNITED STATES
SECRET SERVICE; SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL JAIL;
DAVID WALKER, Psychiatrist; CORRECTIONAL
OFFICER; JOHN MCKAY, Administrator; JEFF
STEWART, Lawyer; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 04-6419
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 04-6420
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPUTY LANE; KANAWHA COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
- 8 -
No. 04-6421
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LIEUTENANT ROGERS, Chief Correctional Officer,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II,
District Judge. (CA-03-2408-2; CA-03-2431-2; CA-03-2437-2; CA-03-
2438-2; CA-03-2439-2; CA-03-2440-2; CA-03-2454-2; CA-03-2455-2; CA-
03-2456-2; CA-03-2457-2; CA-03-2458-2; CA-03-2474-2; CA-03-2475-2;
CA-03-2477-2; CA-03-2478-2; CA-03-2479-2; CA-03-2480-2; CA-03-2481-
2; CA-03-2483-2; CA-03-2484-2; CA-03-2491-2; CA-03-2492-2; CA-03-
2497-2)
Submitted: July 9, 2004 Decided: August 9, 2004
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tammy M. Stone, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 9 -
PER CURIAM:
Tammy M. Stone appeals the district court’s dismissal of
her suits and entry of an order enjoining her from proceeding in
forma pauperis in any future civil action.
After reviewing the record, we affirm the dismissal of
Stone’s suits on the reasoning of the district court. We affirm,
as modified, the district court’s entry of an injunction against
Stone.
Federal courts have both the inherent power and the
constitutional obligation to protect their jurisdiction from
conduct that impairs their ability to carry out Article III
functions. In re Martin-Trigona, 737 F.2d 1254, 1261 (2d Cir.
1984); see Procup v. Strickland,
792 F.2d 1069, 1074 (11th Cir.
1986); Graham v. Riddle,
554 F.2d 133, 134-35 (4th Cir. 1977).
Given Stone’s history of abuse of the legal system, we find that
the district court did not abuse its discretion in enjoining Stone
from future filings. Nonetheless, the district court must take
into account that no person should ever be denied his right to the
processes of the court. In re Green,
598 F.2d 1126, 1127 (8th Cir.
1979). Therefore, we modify the district court's order to read,
“Tammy Stone is hereby enjoined from proceeding in forma pauperis
in any civil action without first obtaining leave of court.”
We grant Stone’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
- 10 -
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
- 11 -
