Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hennessy v. Universal Underwriters, 04-1632 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-1632 Visitors: 56
Filed: Aug. 17, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1632 THOMAS HENNESSY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-64-BO) Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tho
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1632 THOMAS HENNESSY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-64-BO) Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Hennessy, Appellant Pro Se. Rosemary Gill Kenyon, Zebulon Dyer Anderson, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Thomas Hennessy appeals the district court’s judgment granting Universal Underwriters Insurance Company’s motion to dismiss and dismissing as untimely his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hennessy v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co., No. CA-04-64-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer