Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McCoy v. Merrill Lynch, 04-1190 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-1190 Visitors: 50
Filed: Aug. 16, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1190 SUSAN MCCOY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-03-491-2-23BG) Submitted: July 21, 2004 Decided: August 16, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Su
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1190 SUSAN MCCOY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-03-491-2-23BG) Submitted: July 21, 2004 Decided: August 16, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Susan McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Yager Jenkins, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina; Carole Golinski Miller, MAYNARD, COOPER & GALE, PC, Birmingham, Alabama, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Susan McCoy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, awarding summary judgment to Defendant, and dismissing McCoy’s employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCoy v. Merrill Lynch, No. CA-03-491-2-23BG (D.S.C. Jan. 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer