Filed: Sep. 22, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6837 MALCOLM MAXWELL RYIDU-X, a/k/a Richard Edward Janey, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; INMATE GRIEVANCE OFFICE; PAULA R. KRAMER, Associate Warden; MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; PATRICIA ALLEN, Commissioner; MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL ADJUSTMENT CENTER; SEWALL SMITH, Warden; CORPORAL MARKS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distr
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6837 MALCOLM MAXWELL RYIDU-X, a/k/a Richard Edward Janey, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; INMATE GRIEVANCE OFFICE; PAULA R. KRAMER, Associate Warden; MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; PATRICIA ALLEN, Commissioner; MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL ADJUSTMENT CENTER; SEWALL SMITH, Warden; CORPORAL MARKS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distri..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6837 MALCOLM MAXWELL RYIDU-X, a/k/a Richard Edward Janey, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; INMATE GRIEVANCE OFFICE; PAULA R. KRAMER, Associate Warden; MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; PATRICIA ALLEN, Commissioner; MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL ADJUSTMENT CENTER; SEWALL SMITH, Warden; CORPORAL MARKS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-2898-WDQ) Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 22, 2004 Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane- Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ryidu-X v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Servs., No. CA-03-2898-WDQ (D. Md. Apr. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -