Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bush v. Kavanaugh, 04-6535 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-6535 Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 28, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6535 LARRY LAMONT BUSH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JACK KAVANAUGH, Commissioner; RONALD HUTCHINSON, Warden; SEWALL B. SMITH, Warden; BERNARD FORD, Captain; JAKE SUTTON, Sergeant; R. EULISS, Captain, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-02- 3780-AMD) Submitted: September 1, 2004 Decided: September 28, 2004 Befor
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6535 LARRY LAMONT BUSH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JACK KAVANAUGH, Commissioner; RONALD HUTCHINSON, Warden; SEWALL B. SMITH, Warden; BERNARD FORD, Captain; JAKE SUTTON, Sergeant; R. EULISS, Captain, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-02- 3780-AMD) Submitted: September 1, 2004 Decided: September 28, 2004 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Lamont Bush, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Larry Lamont Bush appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bush v. Kavanaugh, No. CA-02-3780-AMD (D. Md. Mar. 4, 2004). We grant the motion to submit on the informal briefs and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer