Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Roberts v. Baptist Hospital, 04-1696 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-1696 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 05, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1696 VICKIE L. MCIVER ROBERTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BAPTIST HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, Director, Employee Relations, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-397-1) Submitted: September 15, 2004 Decided: October 5, 2004 Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1696 VICKIE L. MCIVER ROBERTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BAPTIST HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, Director, Employee Relations, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-397-1) Submitted: September 15, 2004 Decided: October 5, 2004 Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vickie L. McIver Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. William Randolph Loftis, Jr., Kristine Marie Howard, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, L.L.C., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Vickie L. McIver Roberts appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in her action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roberts v. Baptist Hosp., Dir., Employee Relations, No. CA-03-397-1 (M.D.N.C. filed May 17, 2004; entered May 18, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer