Filed: Oct. 21, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2501 TAMMY M. STONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DONNA KAY MURPHY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, District Judge. (CA-03-2241-2) Submitted: August 27, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tammy M. Stone, Appellant Pro
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2501 TAMMY M. STONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DONNA KAY MURPHY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, District Judge. (CA-03-2241-2) Submitted: August 27, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tammy M. Stone, Appellant Pro ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2501 TAMMY M. STONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DONNA KAY MURPHY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, District Judge. (CA-03-2241-2) Submitted: August 27, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tammy M. Stone, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Tammy M. Stone appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stone v. Murphy, No. CA-03-2241-2 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
