Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Pramco II, LLC v. Kissi, 03-1862 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-1862 Visitors: 27
Filed: Oct. 20, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1862 PRAMCO II, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID ADOFO KISSI; EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI, Defendants - Appellants, and BANK OF AMERICA, Defendant. No. 03-1863 PRAMCO II, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID KISSI; EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI, Defendants - Appellants. No. 03-1864 PRAMCO II, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID KISSI; EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI, Defendants - Appellants. Appeals from the United States Distri
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1862 PRAMCO II, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID ADOFO KISSI; EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI, Defendants - Appellants, and BANK OF AMERICA, Defendant. No. 03-1863 PRAMCO II, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID KISSI; EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI, Defendants - Appellants. No. 03-1864 PRAMCO II, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID KISSI; EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI, Defendants - Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 02-42-PJM; CA-02-43-PJM; CA-02-44-PJM) Submitted: September 29, 2004 Decided: October 20, 2004 Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. C. William Michaels, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Emil Hirsch, O’CONNOR & HANNAN, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: David Kissi and Edith Truvillion Kissi appeal from the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of Pramco II, LLC, (“Pramco”) on Pramco’s actions seeking enforcement of three loan guarantees executed by the Kissis. We have reviewed the record, including the district court’s opinions, and the parties’ briefs, and found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We grant Pramco’s motion to submit these appeals on the briefs and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer