Filed: Oct. 19, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1653 MICHAEL HANNON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AMERICAN SERVICE CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-962-JCC) Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 19, 2004 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Hanno
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1653 MICHAEL HANNON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AMERICAN SERVICE CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-962-JCC) Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 19, 2004 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Hannon..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1653
MICHAEL HANNON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
AMERICAN SERVICE CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-962-JCC)
Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 19, 2004
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Hannon, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Lewis Duston, Edward Ross
Levin, Linda Grace Hill, SCHMELTZER, APTAKER & SHEPARD, PC,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Michael Hannon appeals the district court’s order
granting American Service Center Associates, LLC’s motion for
summary judgment and dismissing Hannon’s employment discrimination
and retaliation action, and its order denying Hannon’s motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the grant of summary
judgment on the reasoning of the district court, and the denial of
the motion for reconsideration on our finding of no abuse of
discretion. Temkin v. Frederick County Comm’rs,
945 F.2d 716, 724
(4th Cir. 1991). See Hannon v. American Serv. Ctr. Assoc., LLC,
No. CA-962-JCC (E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 2004; May 11, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -