Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Melton v. Orange County Democratic Party, 04-1329 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-1329 Visitors: 21
Filed: Nov. 02, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1329 SUSAN SEXTON MELTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ORANGE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY; JAN ALLEN, Chairman of the Orange County Democratic Party; KEITH COOK; ALEX ZAFFRON; RICHARD FRANCK; SHARON WORTHINGTON; S.A.M. BROOKS; ROSCOE REEVE; RANDY BRANTLEY, current board members of the Orange County Democratic Party; ALL DEFENDANTS, Defendants - Appellees, and ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; DIANE BROWN, Chairman of the Orang
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1329 SUSAN SEXTON MELTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ORANGE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY; JAN ALLEN, Chairman of the Orange County Democratic Party; KEITH COOK; ALEX ZAFFRON; RICHARD FRANCK; SHARON WORTHINGTON; S.A.M. BROOKS; ROSCOE REEVE; RANDY BRANTLEY, current board members of the Orange County Democratic Party; ALL DEFENDANTS, Defendants - Appellees, and ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; DIANE BROWN, Chairman of the Orange County Board of Elections; MELVIN BEASLEY; JUNE HASS, duly appointed officials of the Orange County Board of Elections, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-96-517-1) Submitted: August 13, 2004 Decided: November 2, 2004 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Susan Sexton Melton, Appellant Pro Se. John Gregory McCormick, Eric Wallace Hinson, Jeffrey E. Rosner, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Susan Sexton Melton appeals the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to Appellees on her claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Melton v. Orange County Democratic Party, No. CA-96- 517-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 11, 2004; entered Feb. 12, 2004). We deny Melton’s motion to authorize preparation of a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer